NixLayer

Export Webflow vs Framer to HTML

Webflow vs Framer compared honestly. Webflow's more mature with better CMS. Framer's easier with better animations. Both lock you in.

What you get

Everything Included

HTML, CSS, JS, images, and fonts - all in one ZIP.

Links Just Work

Navigation works offline, no broken links.

Host Anywhere

Your server, Netlify, Vercel - you choose.

Pixel Perfect

Your design, exactly as you built it.

Ready in Minutes

Most sites export in under 2 minutes.

Full Site Export

Every page, not just the homepage.

About Webflow vs Framer Export

Two visual web builders, both aimed at designers. Different strengths, different frustrations. Here's the real comparison.

Webflow's been around since 2013. It shows, in a good way. The platform is mature, documented, and battle-tested. Thousands of templates. A marketplace. Huge community. When you hit a problem, someone's already solved it.

The CMS is Webflow's killer feature. Build dynamic collections, design templates, manage content. Blogs, portfolios, product catalogs, anything that needs structured data. Framer's CMS exists but feels tacked on.

But Webflow has a learning curve that's honestly brutal. It exposes CSS concepts directly. Flexbox, grid, positioning, you need to understand these to be productive. Designers without web development background struggle for weeks.

Framer flips this. Easier to start, harder to master. The interface feels like Figma. Drag, drop, animate. You can build a decent page in an hour without touching CSS. Animations are buttery smooth and intuitive.

The animation gap is real. Framer was built for micro-interactions. Scroll effects, hover states, page transitions, they just work. Webflow's interactions panel feels clunky by comparision. You can achieve similar results but it takes longer.

Flexibility goes to Webflow. Custom code injection, third-party integrations, more layout options. Framer is more opinionated, which makes it simpler but less adaptable.

Pricing's comparable. Webflow runs $14-39/month for hosting plus workspace fees. Framer is $5-30/month. Neither is cheap for what amounts to a website.

Here's what they have in common: both lock you in. Webflow locks code export behind paid plans. Framer has no export at all. Your site lives on their servers or nowhere.

Our tool exports either platform to static HTML. Build in whichever you prefer, then host independantly. Use the design tool as a design tool, not a hosting company.

Pick Webflow if you need a real CMS or complex layouts. Pick Framer if animations matter most and you want to move fast. Either way, export when you're done.

Frequently Asked Questions

Which is easier to learn, Webflow or Framer?

Framer. It feels more like a design tool from the start. Webflow has a steeper learning curve because it exposes CSS concepts directly, great for control, harder for beginners.

Can I export code from both Webflow and Framer?

Webflow allows code export on paid Workspace plans ($16+/month). Framer has no native export feature at all. Our tool can export either to static HTML for free.

Which is better for animations?

Framer. Its animation system is more intuitive and powerful out of the box. Webflow has interactions but they feel more limited and take longer to set up.

Ready to export your Webflow vs Framer site?

Enter your URL above and get your static HTML files in minutes.

View all export tools →